Abstract

Transcatheter aortic valve replacement is a well-established alternative to surgical aortic valve replacement in high-risk patients with severe symptomatic aortic stenosis. Currently, this technique is shifting towards younger patient groups with intermediate- and low-risk profile, which raises the question about long-term durability. Despite acceptable results up to 5 years, little is currently known about valve performance beyond 5 years. Since valve deterioration, thrombosis and endocarditis seem to be the main factors affecting valve durability, precise and widely accepted definitions of these parameters were stated by the European Association of Percutaneous Cardiovascular Interventions (EAPCI) in 2017, followed by the Valve in Valve International Data (VIVID) group definitions in 2018 and the Valve Academic Research Consortium 3 (VARC-3) definitions in 2021. Until the introduction of these definitions, interstudy comparisons were difficult due to missing uniformity. Since the release of these recommendations, an increasing number of studies have reported their data on long-term durability using these new criteria. The aim of the present article is to discuss the current definitions on bioprosthetic valve durability, and to summarize the available data on long-term durability of transcatheter aortic valves.

Highlights

  • Aortic stenosis (AS) is one of the most common valvular heart diseases in industrialized nations [1]

  • Transcatheter aortic valve replacement is a well-established alternative to surgical aortic valve replacement in high-risk patients with severe symptomatic aortic stenosis

  • Thrombosis and endocarditis seem to be the main factors affecting valve durability, precise and widely accepted definitions of these parameters were stated by the European Association of Percutaneous Cardiovascular Interventions (EAPCI) in 2017, followed by the Valve in Valve International Data (VIVID) group definitions in 2018 and the Valve Academic Research Consortium 3 (VARC-3) definitions in 2021

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Aortic stenosis (AS) is one of the most common valvular heart diseases in industrialized nations [1]. While transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) has become the treatment of choice for older patient groups or patients at prohibitive risk for surgical aortic valve replacement (SAVR), treatment options for younger patients or patients with low surgical risk are more variable, and the interplay between life expectancy and durability of prosthetic heart valves becomes a central consideration. While currently available studies on transcatheter heart valve (THV) durability showed excellent mid-term results, the key issue for considering TAVR in younger and lower risk patients is limited information on long-term durability. Since the release of these standardized definitions, an increasing number of studies reported their data on long-term durability using the new definitions. The aim of the present article is to review contemporary definitions and to summarize available data on long-term durability of THV using these criteria

Definitions of Valve Durability
EAPCI Consensus Statement
VIVID Definition
VARC-3 Definition
Key Findings
Misconceptions in Reporting Long-Term Results on TAVR Durability
Definitions
Death as a Competing Risk
TAVR as a New and Quickly Developing Technique
Findings
Conclusions
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call