Abstract
An experimental study was conducted to evaluate the ductility of reinforced concrete beams longitudinally reinforced with hybrid Fiber Reinforced Polymer (FRP)–steel bars. The specimens were fourteen reinforced concrete beams with and without hybrid reinforcement. The test variables were bar positions, ratio of longitudinal reinforcement, and type of FRP. The beams were loaded until failure using a four-point bending test. The performance of the tested beams was observed using the load–deflection curve obtained from the test. Numerical analysis using the fiber element model was carried out to examine the growth of neutral axis due to the effects of the test variables. The neutral axis curves were then used to estimate the neutral axis angles and displacement indices. The test results showed that the reinforcement position did not significantly affect the flexural capacity of beams with a higher ratio of hybrid reinforcement, but was quite significant in beams with a lower ratio of hybrid reinforcement. It was observed from the test that the flexural capacity of beams with hybrid reinforcement was 15–45% higher than that of beams with conventional steel bars, depending on bar positions and the ratio of longitudinal reinforcement. The ductility of beams with hybrid reinforcement was significantly increased compared to that of beams with FRP, but decreased as the hybrid reinforcement ratio (Af/As) increased. This study also showed that the developed numerical model could predict the flexural behavior of beams with hybrid reinforcement with reasonable accuracy. Based on the test results, parametric analysis, and data obtained from the literature, the use of the neutral axis angle and displacement index value to evaluate the ductility of cross-sections with hybrid reinforcement is proposed.
Highlights
Published: 3 March 2022The main rationale for using hybrid Fiber Reinforced Polymer (FRP)–steel reinforcement in reinforced concrete structures is to compensate for the weaknesses of FRP, which is brittle, has a low elastic modulus [1], and is not resistant to fire [2–5]
Qu et al [6] demonstrated that steel reinforcement combined with Glass Fiber Reinforced Polymer (GFRP) reinforcement increased the flexural capacity and ductility of reinforced concrete beams due to the presence of steel bars
This paper showed that in beams with hybrid reinforcement, FRP reinforcement is responsible for ultimate capacity, while steel reinforcement is responsible for the ductility of the beam
Summary
The main rationale for using hybrid Fiber Reinforced Polymer (FRP)–steel reinforcement in reinforced concrete structures is to compensate for the weaknesses of FRP, which is brittle, has a low elastic modulus [1], and is not resistant to fire [2–5]. Another study demonstrated that the ductility of beams with FRP reinforcement could be improved by either increasing the reinforcement ratio or adding conventional steel bars [7]. A parametric study was carried out to investigate the behavior of neutral axis growth in reinforced concrete sections with conventional steel, CFRP, and GFRP bars [19]. This research showed that the neutral axis curve in reinforced concrete cross-sections with steel bars could be divided into three regions: before cracking, after cracking, and after the tensile reinforcement yielded. The effects of the hybrid reinforcement ratio (Af/As) and the arrangement of the hybrid reinforcements on the flexural performance of reinforced concrete beams with hybrid FRP–steel bars have not been thoroughly investigated. Obtain flexural capacity, strain behavior, and neutral axis growth due to the effects of the test variables, was performed using the fiber element model
Sign-in/Register to view highlights & summary Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Free) 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a call
