Abstract

To investigate the effect of heart rate and virtual monoenergetic image (VMI) on coronary stent imaging in dual-source photon-counting detector computed tomography (PCD-CT). A dynamic cardiac phantom was used to vary the heart rate at 50 beats per minute (bpm), 70bpm, and 90bpm. Five types of stents (4.0mm, 3.5mm, 3.0mm, 2.75mm, and 2.5mm diameter) were scanned at three different locations and reconstructed VMI at 70keV. In addition, 50% stenosis was assessed for 3.0mm and 4.0mm stents. To assess in-stent stenosis, 40keV, 70keV, and 100keV images were compared. Measurable lumen and contrast to noise ratio (CNR) from lumen to stenosis were evaluated quantitatively. A-4-point scale was used for the qualitative image quality of in-stent stenosis. The measurable lumen had no significant differences among heart rates in patent stents (p = 0.55). In-stent stenosis, the residual lumen was significantly larger in 40keV [27.5% (20.8-32.3%)] than in 70keV [11.5% (10.0-23.0%), p < 0.05] and 100keV [0% (0-5.2%), p < 0.05]. The CNR was higher in 40keV [12.5 (7.5-18.2)] than in 70keV [5.3 (2.9-7.7), p < 0.05] and 100keV [1.3 (0.5-2.7), p < 0.05]. The image quality was better in 40keV (3.4 ± 0.7) than in 70keV [(2.6 ± 0.8), p < 0.05] and 100keV [(1.3 ± 0.4), p < 0.05]. Dual-source PCD-CT maintains a measurable lumen even at high heart rates. Adjusting the VMI can be helpful in visualizing the in-stent stenosis.

Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.