Abstract

Interior permanent magnet synchronous motor (IPMSM) are widely used for industrial and traction applications. IPMSM's are known for high efficiency, reliability, and power density. For certain applications, like traction in hybrid electric vehicles, a high torque and power density with wide range of speed is of high importance. The efficiency of the motors can be increased in two ways: (1) increasing the output torque of the motor or (2) reducing the losses of the motor. The torque of various motors has been improved by introducing dual rotor structure and dual excitation using the unused space in electrical machine [1, 2]. The authors in [3] compares number of electrical motors. A quantitative analysis of three types of dual stator flux modulation permanent magnet (PM) motors including magnetic geared motor, and vernier machine. High torque density has been achieved in [4] for double stator brushless PM motors. The design has also been optimized based on split ratio to achieve maximum torque density. Recently, a lot of research has been carried out on vernier permanent magnet motors (VPMMs). The authors proposed a dual stator VPMMs and performs a comparative analysis of proposed design with regular VPM [5]. The proposed design achieved high efficiency and torque density and lower cogging torque. Similarly, power factor based analytical and FEM analysis have been provided in [6] on dual stator VPMM. A high torque density VPMM with dual stator topology has been proposed in [7]. This draft proposes a drum type configuration of dual stator IPMSM with improvement in the torque density, rotor alignment and inner winding temperature compared to single stator IPMSM by utilizing the unused space in the motor.The new design of dual stator IPMSM with 16-poles and 72-slots in each stator are presented with the aim of improving the average torque and torque ripple for industrial and traction applications. The presented design is then compared with the commercial design of single stator IPMSM to show the direct and fair comparison. Fig. 1 (a) shows the proposed design (PD) and conventional design (CD). The CD uses tangential type rotor with rare-earth PMs mounted inside the surface of rotor. The conventional IPMSM offers a good torque capability, but this torque capability can be improved by utilizing the unused space of the rotor. For this purpose, another stator with the same number of stator slots has been added to replace the unused space of rotor resulting in a proposed dual stator IPMSM. To increase the torque of the proposed models, the inner stator is shifted by a half slot pitch to aid the flux lines of outer stator with the inner stator. As the slots of inner stator are aligned with the outer stator-teeth, hence the slot area of an inner stator is somewhat smaller compared to the outer stator-slots. The number of turns of the inner stator-slots are double compared to the outer stator-slots to reduce the current density and inner winding temperature.Due to the addition of an inner stator, the cup rotor is the suitable. However, the cup type rotor configuration decreases the rotor alignment because of only one bearing towards the rotor shaft. Hence, in this draft, the drum type rotor is introduced comprising of two bearing on both sides of stator to support the inner stator shaft and to improve the alignment of the rotor. Furthermore, to reduce the inner winding temperature, the curve-windows are introduced in the drum configuration for the air inlet to reduce the inner winding temperature as presented in Fig. 1 (b).The analysis is performed on the conventional and proposed designs to show the competency of the proposed model. The Fig. 2 (a), and (b) shows the back EMF of the inner and outer stator. Moreover, the back EMF of the conventional design is identical to the outer stator back EMF of the proposed model due to same geometry of outer stator. Moreover, the Fig. 2 (b) shows the substantial improvement in the average torque and torque ripple of the proposed model compared to the conventional design. **

Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call