Abstract
To eliminate current harmonics and to obtain enhanced dynamic behaviors, the voltage feedforward scheme is normally adopted in the control process of transformerless grid-tied converters. However, voltage measurement errors caused by parameter variation of sampling resistance and zero-voltage drift in analog devices will result in DC current injection and distorted grid currents in grid-tied systems. Conventional compensation strategies based on plug-in repetitive controllers and multiple resonant controllers are considered to be effective solutions to solve this problem. Even though undesired components in grid currents can be partially mitigated with these conventional compensation schemes adopted, degraded reference-tracking process with oscillations and slow dynamics are inevitably caused by the controller coupling. To obtain decoupling between reference tracking and disturbance rejection, this paper proposes a dual-loop controller to achieve current regulation and to suppress the disturbances caused by voltage measurement errors. With the proposed dual-loop controller adopted, DC current injection and distortion of grid currents can be effectively attenuated while excellent transient performance with negligible overshoot and fast step response can be simultaneously guaranteed. Frequency-domain analysis and experimental validations are both conducted to verify the effectiveness of the proposed strategy.
Highlights
Grid-tied converters are often used as the interface between distributed generation systems and the unity grid
If no compensation strategy is applied to attenuate these disturbances, serious DC current injection together with grid current distortion may occur in the transformerless grid-tied systems
To deal with this problem, the existing solution is to apply conventional compensation schemes based on plug-in repetitive controller (RC) and multiple resonant controllers (MRSCs)
Summary
Grid-tied converters are often used as the interface between distributed generation systems and the unity grid. Even though improved dynamic responses can be obtained, the adoption of multiple resonant controller results in tuning difficulties and heavy computational burden, especially when the number of embedded resonant controllers increases [20] These previously proposed compensation schemes, such as plug-in RCs and MRSC, are implemented via series or parallel connections with the main controller in the current loop. These control strategies belong to the single-degree-of-freedom control structure, where the reference-tracking performance of the current control will be inevitably degraded by the embedding of RC or MRSCs, resulting in coupling effects between reference tracking and periodic-disturbance rejection.
Sign-in/Register to view highlights & summary Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
