Dual-energy computed tomography in the early evaluation of acute radiation pneumonia

Abstract

ObjectiveTo investigate the value of dual-energy dual-source computed tomography (DSCT) in evaluating pulmonary perfusion changes before and after radiotherapy for esophageal cancer, and its clinical use in the early diagnosis of acute radiation pneumonia (ARP).MethodsWe selected 45 patients with pathologically confirmed esophageal cancer who received radiotherapy (total irradiation dose of 60 Gy). Dual-energy DSCT scans were performed before and after radiotherapy and the normalized iodine concentrations (NIC) in the lung fields of the areas irradiated with doses of > 20 Gy, 10–20 Gy, 5–10 Gy, and < 5 Gy were measured. We also checked for the occurrence of ARP in the patients, and the differences in NIC values and NIC reduction rates before and after radiotherapy were calculated and statistically analyzed.ResultsA total of 16 of the 45 patients developed ARP. The NIC values in the lung fields of all patients decreased at different degrees after radiotherapy, and the NIC values in the area where ARP developed, decreased significantly. The rate of NIC reduction and incidence rate of ARP increased gradually with the increasing irradiation dose, and the inter-group difference in NIC reduction rate was statistically significant (P < 0.05). Based on the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis, the areas under the curves of NIC reduction rate versus ARP occurrence in the V5-10 Gy, V10-20 Gy, and V> 20 Gy groups were 0.780, 0.808, and 0.772, respectively. Sensitivity of diagnosis was 81.3%, 75.0%, and 68.8% and the specificity was 65.5%, 82.8%, and 79.3%, when taking 12.50%, 16.50%, and 26.0% as the diagnostic thresholds, respectively. The difference in NIC values in the lung fields of V<5 Gy before and after radiotherapy was not statistically significant (P > 0.05).ConclusionThe dual-energy DSCT could effectively evaluate pulmonary perfusion changes after radiotherapy for esophageal cancer, and the NIC reduction rate was useful as a reference index to predict ARP and provide further reference for decisions in clinical practice.