Abstract

Although Olympic athletes are celebrated for their sports achievements, they often face serious difficulties in their post-sport career employment. Factors of development that are affecting the quality of post-sport career transition of Olympic athletes are important to acknowledge in the dual career (DC) development perspective. Due to the side lining of academic activities, athletes are often not well prepared for the labor market. If they do not gain sufficient financial background in their careers, it can lead to a lack of proper economic inclusion of athletes in their post-sport career employment and further impact their lives. Career transitions of athletes have been the subject of research in different aspects of DC support (e.g., athletic, psychological, psychosocial, academic/vocational, financial), but most research is linked to the student-athlete DC perspective. Therefore, the aim of our research was to examine the impact of factors directly contributing to the quality of the post-sport career transition in Slovenian elite and Olympic athletes and the social class position and employment of these athletes after the termination of their sports career. From DC support practice, we learned that although athletes often have a proper level of education, their post-sport career transitions were not successful. To fill this gap, 168 elite athletes (Mage = 33.34, SD = 13.1) from Slovenia were asked to complete online questionnaires. The results showed a significant contribution of education and DC support-related finances (e.g., employment of athletes in public administration) to the quality of post-sport career transition. Regarding developing a national DC model and based on empirical research, this study identifies the social class position and employment status of former elite athletes from Slovenia. It also identifies opportunities for further research on the quality of the post-sport career transitions and perspectives on DC support. Understanding how different factors contribute to the integrated development of individual athletes to reach their potential in sports, education, and their post-sport career employment is important for theorists, DC practitioners, and stakeholders working with DC athletes. To develop a sufficient mechanism, DC support providers should consider supporting education along with the financial support of athletes during their sports careers and recognizing study-training ecosystems, based on good practices to successfully transition to their post-sport careers. These findings can also be useful for athletes and their athletic triangle support network (e.g., coaches and parents) as a support in the decision-making.

Highlights

  • The dual career (DC) of athletes is crucial for the integrated development of individual athletes in sports, education, and post-sport career employment

  • Since we assumed that 5 years after the sports career termination is a sufficient time for athletes to observe progress in their post-sport career employment, we considered the limitations that athletes (a) have retired more than 5 years before data collection (n = 72) and (b) were employed to answer the questionnaire regarding their socialclass position

  • The study aimed to examine the impact of factors directly contributing to the quality of post-sport career transition of former elite and Olympic athletes and their social-class position after their sports career termination

Read more

Summary

Introduction

The dual career (DC) of athletes is crucial for the integrated development of individual athletes in sports, education, and post-sport career employment. A growing trend in recent research on athletes’ DC shows interest in studying their support system (e.g., coaches, parents, peers, educators, support staff members) and their perspectives on DC regarding their support for education and work (Stambulova and Wylleman, 2019). Most recent research (Geary et al, 2021) outlined a case for change in how we refer to DC athletes as a person first approach. This study examines the literature regarding DC athletes’ stereotypes, labeling, identity, and wellbeing and proposes a change in how we refer to people engaging in DC

Objectives
Methods
Discussion
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call