Abstract

The fifth edition of the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders published in 2013 has proved to be particularly interesting in the field of sexuality. It introduced a number of significant changes in the definition of sexual norms, among them a widely discussed distinction between paraphilias and paraphilic disorders. The key criterion separating the abnormal sexual interests from the disordered ones is clinically significant distress resulting directly from sexual behavior and/or the risk of suffering or harm to another person as a result of one's sexual behavior. In the case of masochism - which addresses the phenomenon of suffering quite particularly - this distinction is troublesome. Using the example of autoerotic asphyxia - a behavior from the masochism spectrum - the authors critically examine the proposed DSM-5 method of defining the standards of sexual behavior. Interesting in this regard has been a comparison between autoerotic asphyxia and free diving - a nonsexual activity which, although also associated with possible loss of life by reduction of oxygen, has not been pathologized.

Highlights

  • It introduced a number of significant changes in the definition

  • Interesting in this regard has been a comparison between autoerotic asphyxia

  • Death scene characteristics in 118 fatal cases of autoerotic asphyxia compared with suicidal asphyxia

Read more

Summary

Summary

The fifth edition of the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders published in 2013 has proved to be interesting in the field of sexuality. Using the example of autoerotic asphyxia – a behavior from the masochism spectrum – the authors critically examine the proposed DSM-5 method of defining the standards of sexual behavior. Interesting in this regard has been a comparison between autoerotic asphyxia and free diving – a nonsexual activity which, associated with possible loss of life by reduction of oxygen, has not been pathologized. Ambiwalencja ta jest nie tylko zjawiskiem kulturowym, ale obserwuje się ją często także wśród profesjonalistów w zakresie zdrowia psychicznego i zdrowia seksualnego, co znajduje odzwierciedlenie w kryteriach diagnostycznych zaburzeń parafilnych zaproponowanych w klasyfikacji DSM-5

Definiowanie przez wykluczenie
Istotne klinicznie cierpienie oraz zaburzenia funkcjonowania
Zachowania ryzykowne a kryterium krzywdy
Skąd się biorą różnice w wartościowaniu
Uwagi końcowe

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.