Abstract

Mental health disorders effect almost 25% of Americans in a given year and is the leading cause of disability. These disorders can cause substantial detrimental changes in society due to lack of proper screening principles and comprehensive care. Disparities in health, education, employment, wealth and socio-economic standings are quite apparent in the psychiatric population. The Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of the American Psychiatric Association has published a book, which organized mental health pathologies into distinct groups to further standardize the way these illnesses can be categorized. The latest version of this manual, the DSM 5, was published in 2013 and it includes specific changes compared to the DSM IV. There continues to be still criticism aimed at the DSM 5 due its focus on symptomology instead of biological underpinnings of mental illness. Ultimately, the DSM 5 is an effort to further standardize diagnosis of mental illness among all populations with further reduction in mental health disparities.

Highlights

  • One in four Americans over the age of 18 suffer from a diagnosable mental illness and it is the leading cause of disability in the United States [1]

  • The prevalence of lifetime mental health disorders worldwide is between 18-36% while the annual prevalence is 10-20% [2]

  • The American Psychiatric Association (APA) has mitigated this obstacle by having the DSM 5 fully compatible with the codes with the current International Classification of Diseases (ICD) 9 and upcoming ICD 10; a transition, which should assure consistent, thorough continuity of care

Read more

Summary

Shinu Kuriakose*

School of Health Professions, New York Institute of Technology, USA *Corresponding author: Shinu Kuriakose, Associate Professor, DHSc. PA-C, School of Health Professions, New York Institute of Technology, USA To Cite This Article: Shinu Kuriakose, DSM 5: Controversial Acceptance and Ongoing Challenges. 2020 - 7(4). AJBSR.MS.ID.001169. DOI: 10.34297/AJBSR.2020.07.001169.

Introduction
Review of Literature
Implication for clinical practice
Findings
Conclusion
Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.