Abstract

Basis set effects on the DSD-PBEP86-NL and DOD-PBEP86-NL functionals for noncovalent interactions have been extensively studied in this work. The cc-pVXZ (X = D, T, Q, 5, 6) and augmented aug-cc-pVXZ (X = D, T, Q) basis sets are systematically tested without counterpoise (CP) corrections against the well-known S66 database. Additionally, the basis sets of def2-TZVPP and def2-TZVPPD are also examined. Based on our computations, the performances of the aug-cc-pVQZ, cc-pV5Z, and cc-pV6Z basis sets are very approximate to those obtained with the def2-QZVP basis set for both the DSD-PBEP86-NL and DOD-PBEP86-NL functionals. Note that the short-range attenuation parameters for these two functionals were directly optimized using the def2-QZVP basis set without CP corrections against the S66 database. Generally speaking, the cc-pVXZ (X = D, T, Q), aug-cc-pVXZ (X = D, T, Q), def2-TZVPP, and def2-TZVPPD basis sets favor half CP correction for these two functionals. Nevertheless, the aug-cc-pVQZ basis set already performs well without any CP correction, especially for the DOD-PBEP86-NL functional. With respect to accuracy and computational cost, the cc-pVTZ and def2-TZVPP basis sets with half CP corrections are recommended for these two functionals to evaluate interaction energies of large noncovalent complexes.

Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call