Dry Powder Formulations for Inhalation Require a Smaller Aerodynamic Diameter for Usage at High Altitude

Abstract

BackgroundHigh Altitude Pulmonary Edema (HAPE) seriously threatens the health of people at high altitudes. There are drug treatments for HAPE, and dry powder formulations (DPFs) represent a rapid and accessible delivery vehicle for these drugs. However, there are presently no reports on the inhalability of DPFs in low-pressure environments. Given the reduced atmospheric pressure typical at high altitudes, conventional DPFs might not be suitable for inhalation. Therefore, it is necessary to elucidate the deposition behaviors of dry powder in the respiratory tract at low pressure, as well as to improve their pulmonary deposition efficiency via adjustments to their formulation and design. MethodsThe effect of air pressure, inspiratory velocity, and particle properties (such as size, density, and aerodynamic diameter) on pulmonary deposition of DPFs was calculated by a computational fluid dynamics (CFD)-coupled discrete phase model. DPFs of various aerodynamic diameters were prepared by spray drying, and the inhalability of these DPFs in a low-pressure environment was evaluated in mice. Finally, a mouse model of HAPE was established, and the treatment of HAPE by nifedipine-loaded DPFs with small aerodynamic diameter was validated. ResultsCFD results showed that low pressure decreased the deposition of DPFs in the lungs. At 0.5 standard atmosphere, DPFs with aerodynamic diameter of ∼2.0 μm could not enter the lower respiratory tract; however, a decrease in the physical diameter, density, and, consequently, the aerodynamic diameter of the DPFs was able to enhance pulmonary deposition of these powders. To validate the CFD results, three kinds of dry powder with aerodynamic diameters of 0.66, 0.98, and 2.00 μm were prepared by spray drying. Powders with smaller aerodynamic diameter could be inhaled into the lungs of mice more effectively, and, consequently could ameliorate the progression of HAPE more effectively than conventional powders. These results were consistent with the CFD results. ConclusionsLow atmospheric pressure can prevent the pulmonary deposition of DPFs at high altitudes. Compared with conventional DPFs, powders with smaller aerodynamic diameter can be effectively inhaled at these pressures and thus might be more suitable for the treatment the HAPE.