Abstract

To explore long-term changes in intra and inter-class choices between generic compounds, this paper investigates the market trends of two antihypertensive drug classes that have closely related pharmacological mechanisms—angiotensin convertase enzyme inhibitors (ACEIs) and angiotensin receptor blockers (ARBs). We analysed the development of ACEI and ARB markets between 2001 and 2016 in nine European countries, covering the genericization transition periods of both therapeutic groups. The analysis was undertaken on the level of the active pharmaceutical ingredients (API) and focused on international and country-specific diffusion patterns. Comparison of ARB and ACEI therapies shows that although ARBs became off-patent during the observed period, and have a clinical advantage in terms of the adverse event profile over ACEIs, the increasing dominance of ARBs cannot be identified. One explanation is that ACEI therapies became generics earlier, relocating competition to the level of brands, while competition among ARBs remained at the level of the APIs. As for intra-class drug preferences, it was observed that the long-term trends show that ramipril outperformed its ACEI competitors, even though the kinetics and the rank order of preferred active compounds were inconsistent among markets. The diffusion of clinically preferable therapies seems to be ultimately supported by generic entries. In Eastern European countries, the emergence of generic markets has not only improved access to ACE inhibitors and ARBs, but has been a prerequisite for changing preferences. In contrast, genericization resulted in the relative anchoring of prior, branded era-based preferences in some Western European countries, which may be attributed to the role of the cessation of promotion and the fixity of prescription behaviour.

Highlights

  • One explanation is that angiotensin convertase enzyme inhibitors (ACEIs) therapies became generics earlier, relocating competition to the level of brands, while competition among angiotensin receptor blockers (ARBs) remained at the level of the active pharmaceutical ingredients (API)

  • As for intra-class drug preferences, it was observed that the long-term trends show that ramipril outperformed its ACEI competitors, even though the kinetics and the rank order of preferred active compounds were inconsistent among markets

  • Genericization resulted in the relative anchoring of prior, branded era-based preferences in some Western European countries, which may be attributed to the role of the cessation of promotion and the fixity of prescription behaviour

Read more

Summary

Introduction

When choosing a therapy, physicians select the option that ensures the best outcome for patients. In the article from 2017, Kovács and Simon analysed the effect of clinical evidence and price on prescription drug sales, hypothesizing that generic markets favour those drug classes or active moieties from direct competitors that represent the highest therapeutic value. Their assumption, based on EBM principles, was that an absolute clinical ranking (Appendix A, Figure A1) can be defined based on the clinical differences among the active ingredients used in the same indication [5]. Can international or country-specific interrelationships be identified based on longterm prescribing trends?

The Life Cycle of Drugs and the Market Characteristics of Generic Drugs
Factors Influencing the Choice of Drug Therapies and Drug Sales
Data Used in the Investigations
Multidimensional Scaling and Indicators for Interpretation
Approach to Analysing Changes in ACE Inhibitor and Arbs Sales Data over Time
Results
Result of multidimensional scaling of combined andand single-drug
Preferences for ACE Inhibitor Active Ingredients in Six European Countries
Market concentration of inhibitor
Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.