Abstract
Endovascular management of limb-threatening ischemia often requires treatment of tibial occlusive disease. This study was preformed to examine the patency of drug-eluting tibial stents. The medical records of all patients undergoing drug-eluting tibial stent placement for limb-threatening ischemia from June 2004 to June 2008 were retrospectively reviewed. Postprocedural antiplatelet therapy included clopidogrel and aspirin. Patients were followed with serial arterial duplex ultrasonography and had selective subsequent angiographic evaluation based on noninvasive findings. Primary patency of the target lesion, limb salvage, and survival rates were reported. A total of 240 patients underwent 283 tibial angioplasty procedures to treat limb-threatening ischemia during the 4-year period. Fifty-two patients (22%) had a suboptimal balloon result and were treated with a drug-eluting tibial stent. Balloon-expandable paclitaxel-eluting stents were used in all patients (1.2 stents per patient; range, 1-3; median diameter, 2.75 mm; range, 2.5-3.5 mm; median length, 24 mm; range, 20-32 mm). Forty-eight of those 52 patients (92%) had simultaneous endovascular treatment of proximal lesions. Mean follow-up was 14.3 months (range, 1-48 months). Target lesion patency of the drug-eluting tibial stent was 73% at 24 months (SE < 10%). Limb salvage rate in patients treated with drug-eluting tibial stents was 86% at 26 months (SE < 10%), and the survival rate was 65% at 24 months (SE < 10%). Drug-eluting tibial stents are a viable option for the endovascular management of limb-threatening ischemia and have acceptable patency rates. The majority of patients require multilevel endovascular treatment, and close surveillance is required for limb salvage.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.