Drug levels and bleeding complications in atrial fibrillation patients treated with direct oral anticoagulants

Abstract

Essentials Currently, DOACs are given at fixed doses and do not require laboratory monitoring.Direct oral anticoagulant‐specific measurements were performed at trough and peak.Patients who developed bleeding events showed higher DOAC plasma levels at peak.This study suggests the need of a more accurate DOAC dose assessment. BackgroundDirect oral anticoagulants (DOACs) are administered at fixed dose. The aim of the study was to evaluate the relationship between DOAC C‐trough or C‐peak plasma levels and bleeding complications in patients with non‐valvular atrial fibrillation (NVAF).MethodsFive hundred sixty five consecutive naive NVAF patients were enrolled. The DOAC measurements at C‐trough and at C‐peak (available in 411 patients) were performed at steady state, within the first month of treatment. Major bleeding (MB), clinically relevant non‐major bleeding (CRNMB), and minor bleeding (MinB), occurring during 1 year of follow‐up after blood sampling, were recorded. For each DOAC, interval of C‐trough and C‐peak levels was subdivided into four equal classes and results were attributed to these classes; the median values of results were also calculated.ResultsTwo hundred eight patients were on apixaban, 185 on dabigatran, and 172 on rivaroxaban. For 1‐[qqqdeletezzz] year follow up for all patients, we observed: 19 MB (3.36%), 6 CRNMB (1.06%), and 47 MinB (8.31%). The prevalence of bleeding patients with anticoagulant levels in the upper classes of C‐peak activity (II + III + IV) was higher than that in the lowest class. Normalized results of C‐peak levels were higher in patients with bleeding than in those without bleeding.ConclusionsBleeding complications during DOAC treatment were more frequent among atrial fibrillation (AF) patients with higher C‐peak anticoagulant levels. In addition to a previous study that showed an increased risk of thrombotic complications in the patients with low C‐trough levels, this study seems to indicate that patients with NVAF on DOACs would need a more accurate definition of their optimal therapeutic window.