Abstract

The paper deals with the problem of the interchangeability of brand-name and generic drugs. Touching upon official terminology and the normative documents that govern the registration of generics in Russia and foreign countries, the authors state that there is no concerted approach to estimating drug interchangeability, indicate that there are some disadvantages of using a method for proving the bioequivalence of the compared drugs as evidence for their therapeutic equivalence, and point out that Russia’s legal regulation of drug circulation lacks attention to the proper use of generics. The problem of interchangeability is particularly acute when prescribing narrow therapeutic range drugs, including anticonvulsant drugs. The results of the investigations discussed in the article demonstrate the need for a very cautious approach to using generic drugs in the therapy of epilepsy due to the fact that the disease may worsen. The authors come to the conclusion that treatment with less expensive generic drugs is far from always more economical. The change from a brand-name for a generic drug should be carefully approached, basing on the data of properly designed and conducted studies of therapeutic equivalence.

Highlights

  • Статья посвящена проблеме взаимозаменяемости оригинальных и воспроизведенных лекарственных препаратов

  • Drug interchangeability: Clinical efficacy and safety Zyryanov S.K.1,2, Fitilev S.B.1, Shkrebneva I.I.1, Vozzhaev A.V.1 1RUDN University of Russia, Moscow, Russia; 2City Clinical Hospital Twenty-Four, Moscow Healthcare Department, Moscow, Russia 16, Miklukho-Maklai St., Moscow 117198; 239, Fourth Vyatsky Lane, Moscow 127287 The paper deals with the problem of the interchangeability of brand-name and generic drugs

  • Touching upon official terminology and the normative documents that govern the registration of generics in Russia and foreign countries, the authors state that there is no concerted approach to estimating drug interchangeability, indicate that there are some disadvantages of using a method for proving the bioequivalence of the compared drugs as evidence for their therapeutic equivalence, and point out that Russia’s legal regulation of drug circulation lacks attention to the proper use of generics

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Статья посвящена проблеме взаимозаменяемости оригинальных и воспроизведенных лекарственных препаратов. Взаимозаменяемость лекарственных препаратов определяется на основании следующих шести параметров: 1) эквивалентность качественных и количественных характеристик фармацевтических субстанций; 2) эквивалентность лекарственной формы; 3) эквивалентность или сопоставимость вспомогательных веществ; 4) идентичность способа введения и применения; 5) отсутствие клинически значимых различий при проведении исследования биоэквивалентности или терапевтической эквивалентности; 6) соответствие производителя лекарственного средства требованиям надлежащей производственной практики (Good Manufacturing Practice – GMP).

Results
Conclusion

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.