Abstract

The aim of the present study was to compare the bioavailability of nifedipine when administered as a hydrophilic matrix tablet (ER) and a push–pull osmotic pump tablet (XL) administrated after fasting, and to evaluate the effect of food for the hydrophilic matrix tablet. For this purpose, three separate studies were performed on healthy volunteers ( n=58) including gammascintigraphic monitoring of tablet erosion and localisation in the gastrointestinal tract for ER in one study. Both ER and XL provided almost constant drug delivery over 24 h, after administration under fasting conditions, and bioequivalence was obtained according to 90% confidence intervals of the difference between formulations within 80–125% for C max and AUC. Food significantly increased AUC for ER but no significant difference was obtained between ER and XL with food with respect to extent of bioavailability. The rate of absorption was increased to a higher degree for ER than for XL, as indicated by a C max which was almost twice as high for ER compared with XL. This finding was shown to be related to an increased tablet-erosion rate for ER, leading to more rapid drug release.

Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.