Abstract

The National Confidential Enquiry into Perioperative Deaths (NCEPOD) report recommended that 'fluid prescribing be given the same value as drug prescribing', yet fluid prescription is commonly delegated to junior doctors despite being a notoriously challenging topic. When antibiotics are given as an infusion they are diluted in 100ml of fluid, which is often unaccounted for when thinking about a patient's fluid requirements. This closed-loop audit aimed to assess first, intravenous (IV) fluid therapy and second, electrolyte prescribing compliance with National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE) guidelines, with and without the additional fluid given with antibiotic administration. Two retrospective audits were performed. Total fluid and electrolyte volume received with and without antibiotic fluids was correlated with recommendations in the NICE guidelines. Between cycles 1 and 2, potassium chloride with sodium chloride and glucose (PSG) was introduced as an alternative to IV maintenance fluid, and bolusing of antibiotics was mandatory. When analysing total fluid volume input per day, 10.4% and 7.45% of patients met their fluid requirement accurately in the first and second cycles, respectively. Within cycle 1, the mean total additional fluid that was given over 3 days with antibiotics was 1,572.73ml. In cycle 2, this decreased to 469.44ml when antibiotics were given as a bolus. In this closed-loop audit we noted that patients receiving IV fluids and IV antibiotics received too much additional fluid when the antibiotic dilution fluid was taken into account. Additional fluid was reduced alongside the proportion of electrolyte complications when bolusing of antibiotics was introduced. We recommend that that all nurses are trained to give antibiotics as a bolus because it can help to reduce fluid-related complications.

Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call