Abstract
AbstractForest and water‐resources management in floodplains requires an understanding of the nature of drought specific to ecosystems there. The complex relationships among floodplain vegetation, topography and hydrology affect water availability. This paper investigated whether hydrological assumptions within meteorological drought indicators and ecophysiological assumptions within remote‐sensing drought indicators reflect drought deficits as they occur in floodplain forests. We compared the performance of widely used meteorological and remote‐sensing drought indicators in floodplain forests to tree‐ring validation using five species at three floodplains in eastern Texas, USA. We found that the water balance in the Standardized Precipitation Evapotranspiration Index and the water loss estimated by the Evaporative Stress Index were useful models of water deficits in floodplain forests at the site and sub‐site scales, respectively. Hydrological and stand conditions varied among sites enough to affect the specific patterns of tree‐species responded to drought. However, of the species we examined, tree rings in green ash were the most consistently affected by drought across floodplains and were the most closely correlated with both meteorological and remotely sensed drought indicators. Finally, drought effects varied by species and among and within floodplains, but generally, growth of trees in topographically drier sites was more closely correlated with drought indicators.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.