Abstract

PurposeThe purpose of this paper is to answer the following research question: how can intermediaries contribute to social impact creation through their interventions at different levels of distribution networks in the base of the pyramid (BoP) markets?Design/methodology/approachThe paper adopts an embedded case study of an intermediary organization. The analysis focuses on the intervention of the intermediary on the distribution stages of supply chains in four different projects in the food sector in Ethiopia, Benin, Nigeria and Bangladesh.FindingsThe embedded case study reveals essential formal and informal roles undertaken by the intermediary organization to develop decentralized distribution networks based on local micro-entrepreneurs. The study proposes that efforts undertaken by the intermediaries toward knowledge sharing and capacity building among partners can enable the adoption of pro-poor strategies across the supply chain. Moreover, hybrid intermediaries can act as “guardians” of the mutual value creation approach since one of their key roles is to advocate the needs of the BoP.Research limitations/implicationsImportant implications for improving nutrition and food security in the BoP markets are developed based on the empirical findings. The findings open avenues for further research into the antecedents of retention rates in distribution networks based on local micro-entrepreneurs.Practical implicationsFindings have implications for different types of BoP initiatives by highlighting how intermediary organizations intervene to develop distribution models with a special focus on social impact.Originality/valueThis paper fills an important research gap by discussing social impact aspects in BoP supply chains by adopting the perspective of intermediary organizations.

Highlights

  • The main claim of the base of the pyramid (BoP) literature is that businesses in these markets are capable of mutual value creation – simultaneously creating profit and alleviating poverty (London et al, 2010; Prahalad and Hammond, 2002)

  • We explore how partnerships with hybrid intermediary organizations can serve as mechanisms to overcome institutional voids and ensure effective reach of geographically scattered BoP consumers

  • This chapter outlines main insights gained from each of the four projects and the interventions of the intermediary, based on the analytical constructs outlined by the impact value chain (IVC) model

Read more

Summary

Introduction

The main claim of the base of the pyramid (BoP) literature is that businesses in these markets are capable of mutual value creation – simultaneously creating profit and alleviating poverty (London et al, 2010; Prahalad and Hammond, 2002). Literature points to numerous challenges which can hinder these enterprises from achieving mutual value creation (London et al, 2010). Some of the main external challenges are due to the institutional voids in BoP markets (Stephan et al, 2015). The internal challenges originate from the lack of relevant. The full terms of this licence may be seen at http://creativecommons.org/licences/by/4.0/legalcode

Objectives
Methods
Results
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call