Abstract

ContextIdentifying factors driving patterns of species communities in heterogenous human-dominated landscapes remains elusive despite extensive research. Biodiversity is thought to decrease with habitat modification, as sensitive species are lost. Conversely, diversity has also been shown increase at moderate levels of landscape modification where greater habitat heterogeneity supports a diverse suite of species.ObjectivesWe explore patterns of avian diversity and abundance in heterogenous landscapes using a novel integration of multiple dimensional gradients of human-mediated modification.MethodsWe attempt to identify aspects of landscape heterogeneity driving patterns of avian diversity and abundance in agro-urban–rural systems. Specifically, we utilize an intuitive multi-dimensional gradient distinguishing between two axes of human-influence, variation in the built environment (hard–soft) and in agricultural development (green–brown). We use these as covariates in community N-mixture models to describe variation in species abundance and diversity.ResultsAvian richness was greatest in more heterogeneous regions of the landscape. Responses of individual species were variable, with sensitive species declining, while generalist species increased, leading to higher overall diversity in human-dominated regions.ConclusionsSpecies abundance and diversity is maximized in more heterogeneous parts of landscape mosaics. By characterizing distinct axes of human influence that capture spectrum of land use, we can identify differential effects confounded in traditional landscape metrics. Critically, we demonstrate that multi-dimensional landscape gradients provide a more nuanced understanding of how patterns of biodiversity emerge. Acknowledging that biodiversity is not always negatively impacted by habitat modification offers encouraging insight to guide conservation and management in human-dominated landscapes.

Highlights

  • Species abundance and diversity is maximized in more heterogeneous parts of landscape mosaics

  • By characterizing distinct axes of human influence that capture spectrum of land use, we can identify differential effects confounded in traditional landscape metrics

  • We demonstrate that multi-dimensional landscape gradients provide a more nuanced understanding of how patterns of biodiversity emerge

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Spatial variation in landscape structure and composition results in associated shifts in ecological communities (Aronson et al 2016; Rybicki et al 2020). In heterogenous landscapes that are influenced by varying degrees and types of human activity, an improved understanding of the ultimate drivers of biodiversity is necessary to ensure long-term persistence of populations, communities, and ecosystem function (Sol et al, 2014). Though human-dominated systems are often considered to be fundamentally distinct, numerous ecological theories developed in natural systems have since been applied in highly modified and fragmented landscape mosaics (Parris, 2018). The effects of habitat fragmentation on biodiversity remains hotly debated (e.g., Fletcher et al 2018; Fahrig et al 2019) because landscape mosaics often increase spatial heterogeneity of available habitat types at the landscape scale, which may increase species diversity (Fahrig, 2017; Roth, 1976; Turner, 2005)

Objectives
Methods
Results
Discussion
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call