Abstract
This paper examines critically the method of abstraction offered by critical realism. Our main argument is that critical realism fails to articulate the synthetic side to abstraction. For this reason, the critical realist method is unable to capture the 'inner connection' of social phenomena. We argue that critical realism is prone to extend a method (partially) applicable to the local and specific level of analysis to the historical level. The paper develops a method of abstraction, 'systematic abstraction', that is appropriate to this historical level. We argue that systematic abstraction constitutes a radical addition to critical realism, one which challenges the fundamental precepts of the critical realist approach to abstraction. Copyright 2002, Oxford University Press.
Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
