Abstract

Road traffic injuries are the ninth cause of death across all age groups, globally (WHO, 2015). Many road traffic crashes are caused by Driving Under the Influence (DUI) of alcohol by persons who have previously had their license suspended for the same reason. The aim of this study was to identify specific risk factors and personality characteristics in repeat offenders. The sample was comprised of 260 subjects who were not repeat DUI offenders (DUI-NR), but had a single license suspension between 2010 and 2011; and 97 repeat offenders who received at least two DUI convictions within a period of 5 years. At the time of their first driving license suspension, participants provided their blood alcohol content (BAC) and completed a valid MMPI-2 test. ANOVA and MANOVAs were performed to determine whether there were significant differences in BAC and MMPI-2 profiles between DUI-NR and DUI-R participants and a logistic regression was run to identify whether BAC at the time of the first suspension and specific personality features could predict recidivism. A two-step cluster analysis was run to identify recidivist typologies. Results showed that, relative to DUI-NR participants, DUI-R participants had higher BAC at the time of their first conviction and more problematic MMPI-2 profiles, despite the presence of social desirability responding. The best predictors of recidivism were BAC and the scales of Lie (L), Correction (K), Psychopathic Deviate (4-Pd), Hypomania (9-Ma), and Low Self-Esteem (LSE). Two-step cluster analyses identified two recidivist profiles, according to 32 selected MMPI-2 validity, clinical, content, supplementary, and PSY-5 scales. Comparisons with previous research are discussed and ideas for further study are generated.

Highlights

  • Others have attempted to predict recidivism using a combination of demographic variables and personality characteristics, employing statistical procedures such as multiple regression, discriminant function analysis, and logistic regression. We focused on those that drew on blood alcohol content (BAC) and the Minnesota Multiphasic Personality Inventory-2 (MMPI-2) [15]

  • The analysis of variance (ANOVA) showed a significant difference between the Driving Under the Influence (DUI)-NR and DUI-R groups in BAC at the time of the first driving license suspension

  • It is interesting to note that the mean BAC of the DUI-R group was almost three times the maximum allowed by current Italian legislation (0.50 g/mL), demonstrating the severity of the social problem

Read more

Summary

Objectives

The aim of this study was to identify specific risk factors and personality characteristics in repeat offenders. The first purpose of this study was to test differences between BAC and the MMPI-2 scores of the DUI-NR and DUI-R groups. The main aim of our study was to investigate which variables could help clinicians detect DUI offenders at risk of relapse

Methods
Results
Discussion
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call