Abstract

We consider Drell-Yan production pp → V*X → LX at small qT ≪ Q, where qT and Q are the total transverse momentum and invariant mass of the leptonic final state L. Experimental measurements require fiducial cuts on L, which in general introduce enhanced, linear power corrections in qT/Q. We show that they can be unambiguously predicted from factorization, and resummed to the same order as the leading-power contribution. For the fiducial qT spectrum, they constitute the complete linear power corrections. We thus obtain predictions for the fiducial qT spectrum to N3LL and next-to-leading-power in qT/Q. Matching to full NNLO ( {alpha}_s^2 ), we find that the linear power corrections are indeed the dominant ones, and once included by factorization, the remaining fixed-order corrections become almost negligible below qT ≲ 40 GeV. We also discuss the implications for more complicated observables, and provide predictions for the fiducial ϕ* spectrum at N3LL+NNLO. We find excellent agreement with ATLAS and CMS measurements of qT and ϕ*. We also consider the {p}_T^{mathrm{ell}} spectrum. We show that it develops leptonic power corrections in qT/(Q − 2 {p}_T^{mathrm{ell}} ), which diverge near the Jacobian peak {p}_T^{mathrm{ell}} ∼ Q/2 and must be kept to all powers to obtain a meaningful result there. Doing so, we obtain for the first time an analytically resummed result for the {p}_T^{mathrm{ell}} spectrum around the Jacobian peak at N3LL+NNLO. Our method is based on performing a complete tensor decomposition for hadronic and leptonic tensors. We show that in practice this is equivalent to often-used recoil prescriptions, for which our results now provide rigorous, formal justification. Our tensor decomposition yields nine Lorentz-scalar hadronic structure functions, which for Z/γ* → ℓℓ or W → ℓν directly map onto the commonly used angular coefficients, but also holds for arbitrary leptonic final states. In particular, for suitably defined Born-projected leptons it still yields a LO-like angular decomposition even when including QED final-state radiation. Finally, we also discuss the application to qT subtractions. Including the unambiguously predicted fiducial power corrections significantly improves their performance, and in particular makes them applicable near kinematic edges where they otherwise break down due to large leptonic power corrections.

Highlights

  • The neutral and charged Drell-Yan processes, pp → Z/γ∗ → and pp → W → ν, are important benchmark processes at the LHC

  • We have shown that for leptonic measurements that are azimuthally symmetric at leading power, all linear power corrections uniquely arise from linear fiducial power corrections L(i1) multiplying the leading-power hadronic structure functions W−(01),2,4,5

  • In the top-right panel of figure 13, we show the difference between the LP φ∗ spectrum and the resummed and matched φ∗ spectrum, at NLL(0+L), NNLL(0+L)+NLO0 and N3LL(0+L)+NNLO0, which corresponds to the left panel but with the linear power corrections resummed

Read more

Summary

Introduction

The neutral and charged Drell-Yan processes, pp → Z/γ∗ → and pp → W → ν, are important benchmark processes at the LHC. This allows one to include them in the factorization theorem by treating the leptonic vector-boson decay exactly in qT and makes it possible to resum them at the same level of precision as the singular cross section dσ(0) This yields a resummation of the NLP terms dσ(1) to N3LL. It is based on performing a Lorentz decomposition of the hadronic and leptonic tensors, which encode the production and decay of the intermediate vector boson.

Factorizing production and decay
Hadronic tensor decomposition
Reference frame interpretation
Leptonic decomposition and relation to angular coefficients
Definition of CS angles
Leptonic decay parametrization by angles
Extension to more complicated leptonic final states
Factorization for fiducial power corrections
Linear fiducial power corrections
Leptonic fiducial power corrections
Generic fiducial power corrections
Uniqueness of linear power corrections
Power counting hadronic structure functions
Relation to the literature
Resummation of leading-power hadronic structure functions
Renormalization group evolution
Canonical scales and nonperturbative prescription
Fixed-order matching and profile scales
Estimate of perturbative uncertainties
Resumming fiducial power corrections
Numerical inputs and computational setup
Origin of power corrections
Numerical results
Lepton pT spectrum
Applications in fixed-order subtractions
Comparison to data
Findings
Conclusions
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call