Abstract
Dream reports are examined as a function of the real world and dream contents to which they correspond. It is noted that the said correspondence is not a sufficient determinant of the verbal realizations of the dream reports. An account of such reports calls for additional rules which order pragmatic constraints. These rules bear on a conversational-based analysis of presupposition and suggest that the semantics of natural language is not exhausted by a Tarskian theory of truth.
Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
