Abstract
WHILE DIPLOMATS and their academic critics agree that planning and analysis must be part of policy formulation in the foreign policy field, there remains considerable disagreement on the need for distinct planning and analysis units within foreign offices and, consequently, about their precise mandate.' This article shows how a public historian helped to answer this dilemma for the Canadian Department of External Affairs.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
