Abstract
The article argues that the sctentific credibility and policymaking utility of policy evaluation research is threatened by inappropriate inference strategies. These inference strategies are a consequence of a system of incentives and a methodology that encourage vague, ambiguous, or nonspecification of primary inferences and extended or unwar ranted tangential inferences. The result is policy research designed more to promote the enterprise of policy research than to assist in the useful application of research in policymaking settings. These points are illustrated through an analysis of the inference strategy pursued in the Police Foundation's Kansas City Preventive Patrol Experiment. One solution to the problem of inappropriate inferencing is for policy researchers to adopt the practice ofspecifying an illustrative range of potential primary inferences at the initial stages of analysis.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.