Abstract

BackgroundThe endoscopic thyroidectomy bilateral areola approach (ETBAA) improved cosmetic outcomes significantly and is now widely applied. The usage of drainage tubes is controversial in conventional open thyroidectomy (COT), but studies about drainage placement decisions during ETBAA are still limited. This study aimed to determine the feasibility of having no drainage tube applied during ETBAA on patients with papillary thyroid carcinoma.MethodsThe clinical data of patients undergoing ETBAA from July 2018 to May 2021 was retrospectively collected. The patients were divided into two groups based on drain placement: no-drain and drain. The two groups were matched at a ratio of 1:1. Fifty-five patients from each group were finally included. Postoperative complications and follow-up data were compared between the two groups.ResultsNo significant difference was observed between the two groups in the incidence of postoperative complications, including hemorrhage, surgical site infection, and subcutaneous seroma. Compared with the drain group, the operation time of the no-drain group was significantly shorter [(107.75 ± 24.59) min vs. (119.91 ± 34.05) min, P < 0.05]. The total and postoperative hospital stay was significantly shorter in the no-drain group [(2.40 ± 0.71) days vs. (4.78 ± 1.33) days, P < 0.001, (2.04 ± 0.19) days vs. (2.15 ± 0.36) days, P < 0.05], and the costs of surgical consumables were also significantly lower [(6,820.83 ± 164.29) CNY vs. (7,494.13 ± 216.7) CNY, P < 0.05]. The postoperative pain score of the no-drain group was significantly lower than the drain group [(1.58 ± 0.63) vs. (1.89 ± 0.76), P < 0.05].ConclusionsNo drainage applied during ETBAA on papillary thyroid carcinoma is safe and feasible. This practice does not increase the risk of postoperative complications, but it does shorten the operation time and hospital stay, as well as reduce medical costs. Furthermore, it alleviates the suffering of patients.

Highlights

  • The incidence rate of thyroid cancer has been steadily increasing for some years and has a dominant incidence in females [1, 2]

  • Thyroidectomy is performed via a transcervical incision, which leaves a prominent scar on the anterior neck

  • Inclusion criteria were as follows: [1] female patients under the age of 55; [2] the surgical approach is endoscopic thyroidectomy bilateral areola approach (ETBAA); [3] no signs of lateral cervical lymph node or distant metastasis before the operation; [4] postoperative pathology confirmed the diagnosis of papillary thyroid carcinoma

Read more

Summary

Introduction

The incidence rate of thyroid cancer has been steadily increasing for some years and has a dominant incidence in females [1, 2]. Various surgical techniques have emerged to improve the cosmetic outcomes and life quality of thyroidectomy patients. Multiple surgical approaches, such as bilateral axillobreast [3, 4], transaxillary [5], areola [6], and transoral [7, 8], have been developed since the introduction of endoscopic thyroidectomy. The endoscopic thyroidectomy bilateral areola approach (ETBAA) is the most commonly used. The endoscopic thyroidectomy bilateral areola approach (ETBAA) improved cosmetic outcomes significantly and is widely applied. The usage of drainage tubes is controversial in conventional open thyroidectomy (COT), but studies about drainage placement decisions during ETBAA are still limited. This study aimed to determine the feasibility of having no drainage tube applied during ETBAA on patients with papillary thyroid carcinoma

Objectives
Methods
Results
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call