Abstract

'Charleston Belle', a root-knot nematode-resistant pepper (Capsicum annuum var. annuum [Grossum Group]), and its susceptible recurrent parent, 'Keystone Resistant Giant', were compared as spring crops for managing the southern root-knot nematode (Meloidogyne incognita) in fall-cropped cucumber (Cucumis sativus) and squash (Cucurbita pepo) at Blackville, SC and Tifton, GA. 'Charleston Belle' exhibited minimal root galling and nematode reproduction, and 'Keystone Resistant Giant' exhibited severe root galling and high nematode reproduction. Cucumber grown in plots following 'Charleston Belle' had lower (P ≤ 0.001) root gall severity indices than following 'Keystone Resistant Giant' (4.2 versus 4.9, respectively). Cucumber yields were 87% heavier (P ≤ 0.0001) and numbers of fruit were 85% higher (P ≤ 0.0001) in plots previously planted to 'Charleston Belle' than to 'Keystone Resistant Giant'. Squash grown in plots following 'Charleston Belle' had lower (P ≤ 0.001) root gall severity indices than following 'Keystone Resistant Giant' (4.0 versus 4.8, respectively). Squash yields were 55% heavier (P ≤ 0.01) and numbers of fruit were 50% higher (P ≤ 0.001) in plots previously planted to 'Charleston Belle' than to 'Keystone Resistant Giant'. These results demonstrate that root-knot nematode-resistant bell pepper cultivars such as 'Charleston Belle' are useful tools for managing M. incognita in double-cropping systems with cucurbit crops.

Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.