Double vitrification and warming of blastocysts does not affect pregnancy, miscarriage or live birth rates

Abstract

Research questionDoes double blastocyst vitrification and warming affect pregnancy, miscarriage or live birth rates, or birth outcomes, from embryos that have undergone preimplantation genetic testing for aneuploidies (PGT-A) testing? DesignThis retrospective observational analysis of embryo transfers was performed at a single centre between January 2017 and August 2022. The double-vitrification group included frozen blastocysts that were vitrified after 5–7 days of culture, warmed, biopsied (either once or twice) and re-vitrified. The single vitrification (SV) group included fresh blastocysts that were biopsied at 5–7 days and then vitrified. ResultsA comparison of the 84 double-vitrification blastocysts and 729 control single-vitrification blastocysts indicated that the double-vitrification embryos were frozen later in development and had expanded more than the single-vitrification embryos. Of the 813 embryo transfer procedures reported, 452 resulted in the successful delivery of healthy infants (56%). There were no significant differences between double-vitrification and single-vitrification embryos in the pregnancy, miscarriage or live birth rates achieved after single-embryo transfer (55% versus 56%). Logistic regression indicated that while reduced live birth rates were associated with increasing maternal age at oocyte collection, longer culture prior to freezing and lower embryo quality, double vitrification was not a significant predictor of live birth rate. ConclusionsBlastocyst double vitrification was not shown to impact pregnancy, miscarriage or live birth rates. Although caution is necessary due to the study size, no effects of double vitrification on miscarriage rates, birthweight or gestation period were noted. These data offer reassurance given the absence of the influence of double vitrification on all outcomes after PGT-A.