Abstract
Abstract Screening mammograms from a County wide breast screening programme were double read by any 2 of a team of 3 radiologists. There were 398 cases where the 2 readers disagreed. The third radiologist was asked to arbitrate on these. The third readers recalled 49% and returned the other 51% to normal screening. From the 196 recalled for assessment, 9 underwent histological examination and from these, 4 malignant lesions were found. From the 202 sent to normal screen, one true interval cancer has occurred during a 3 year follow-up period. Double reading of mammograms increases the sensitivity of screening. If this is combined with arbitration in disagreements the number of unnecessary recalls is reduced.
Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Free) 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a call
