Abstract

Simple SummarySelection for an increased meatiness in beef cattle has resulted in double-muscled (DM) animals, owing to the inactivation of the myostatin gene. These animals are characterized by an excellent conformation and an extremely high carcass yield, coinciding with a reduced organ mass. As a consequence, voluntary feed intake is reduced, but feed efficiency is considerably improved, although maintenance requirements are not clearly reduced. DM animals are more susceptible to respiratory disease, stress and dystocia, requiring extra attention for accommodation and welfare. Carcasses of DM animals are very lean, and intramuscular fat content is low. The fatty acid profile is different when compared with non-DM animals, containing less saturated fatty acids. Collagen content of the meat is lower, so that meat from double-muscled animals is mostly more tender. However, meat tenderness, color and juiciness are not always improved. A different metabolism as a consequence of faster glycolytic myofibers can be partly responsible for this phenomenon. DM animals are interesting for the producer and butcher, and beneficial for the consumer, if an appropriate nutrition and accommodation, and adequate slaughter conditions are taken into account.Molecular biology has enabled the identification of the mechanisms whereby inactive myostatin increases skeletal muscle growth in double-muscled (DM) animals. Myostatin is a secreted growth differentiation factor belonging to the transforming growth factor-β superfamily. Mutations make the myostatin gene inactive, resulting in muscle hypertrophy. The relationship between the different characteristics of DM cattle are defined with possible consequences for livestock husbandry. The extremely high carcass yield of DM animals coincides with a reduction in the size of most vital organs. As a consequence, DM animals may be more susceptible to respiratory disease, urolithiasis, lameness, nutritional stress, heat stress and dystocia, resulting in a lower robustness. Their feed intake capacity is reduced, necessitating a diet with a greater nutrient density. The modified myofiber type is responsible for a lower capillary density, and it induces a more glycolytic metabolism. There are associated changes for the living animal and post-mortem metabolism alterations, requiring appropriate slaughter conditions to maintain a high meat quality. Intramuscular fat content is low, and it is characterized by more unsaturated fatty acids, providing healthier meat for the consumer. It may not always be easy to find a balance between the different disciplines underlying the livestock husbandry of DM animals to realize a good performance and health and meat quality.

Highlights

  • There is a persisting trend to improve carcass quality in specialized beef breeds [1,2,3]

  • A review of the characteristics of DM animals is extant [13], but this paper aims to relate different characteristics of double muscling to feed intake, health, reproduction, histology and metabolism, and carcass and meat quality, and defines the consequences for livestock husbandry

  • DM animals may provide some advantages for farmers, meat industry and consumers, such as an efficient conversion of feed into high valuable carcasses, a tender meat with a low fat content, indicating a meat that is healthier than normal

Read more

Summary

Introduction

There is a persisting trend to improve carcass quality in specialized beef breeds [1,2,3]. A smaller fifth quarter is more interesting for both the producer and the butcher, resulting in more edible meat cuts. Double-muscled (DM) animals produce very lean meat. They can be classified as an extreme type of late maturing animals [6]. They are often defined as animals with muscle hypertrophy. The Belgian Blue breed is a typical example of the exploitation of the myostatin gene. A review of the characteristics of DM animals is extant [13], but this paper aims to relate different characteristics of double muscling to feed intake, health, reproduction, histology and metabolism, and carcass and meat quality, and defines the consequences for livestock husbandry. In referring to DM animals it is inferred that they are homozygote for myostatin; if heterozygote animals are involved, it is explicitly mentioned

Origin of DM Animals
Impact of Double Muscling on Conformation and Carcass Quality
Impact of Double Muscling on Organ Size
Consequences of Double Muscling for Locomotion
Impact of Double Muscling on Reproduction Performance
Influence of Double Muscling on Histological Aspects of Skeletal Muscle
Influence of Double Muscling on Metabolism
Influence of Double Muscling on Stress Susceptibility
Effect of Double Muscling on Meat Quality
Findings
Conclusions
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call