Abstract
In the preceding chapter, some of the consequences of the ULP on the distribution of null operator constructions were explored. One important outcome of the framework developed here is that it severely constrains the distribution of null operators at the levels of D- and S-Structure. As we saw, this is of particular relevance in the case of parasitic gap constructions, especially in view of the fact that in these structures, the licensing of null operators at S-Structure requires a process of chain formation which is unnecessary in the case of other (predicative) null operator constructions. Thus, parasitic gaps constitute a revealing source of data for establishing the structural conditions which govern the identification and licensing of null operators. Another important aspect of the ULP concerns the thematic status of possible parasitic gaps: since null operators are ruled out as adjuncts at D-Structure, parasitic gaps may only be found in argument positions.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.