Abstract

Crystallization and phase separation in the melt in semicrystalline block copolymers (BCPs) compete in defining the final solid state structure and morphology. In crystalline–crystalline di-block copolymers the sequence of crystallization of the two blocks plays a definitive role. In this work we show that the use of epitaxial crystallization on selected crystalline substrates allows achieving of a control over the crystallization of the blocks by inducing crystal orientations of the different crystalline phases and a final control over the global morphology. A sample of polyethylene-block-syndiotactic polypropylene (PE-b-sPP) block copolymers has been synthesized with a stereoselective living organometallic catalyst and epitaxially crystallized onto crystals of two different crystalline substrates, p-terphenyl (3Ph) and benzoic acid (BA). The epitaxial crystallization on both substrates produces formation of highly ordered morphologies with crystalline lamellae of sPP and PE highly oriented along one direction. However, the epitaxial crystallization onto 3Ph should generate a single orientation of sPP crystalline lamellae highly aligned along one direction and a double orientation of PE lamellae, whereas BA crystals should induce high orientation of only PE crystalline lamellae. Thanks to the use of the two selective substrates, the final morphology reveals the sequence of crystallization events during cooling from the melt and what is the dominant event that drives the final morphology. The observed single orientation of both crystalline PE and sPP phases on both substrates, indeed, indicates that sPP crystallizes first onto 3Ph defining the overall morphology and PE crystallizes after sPP in the confined interlamellar sPP regions. Instead, PE crystallizes first onto BA defining the overall morphology and sPP crystallizes after PE in the confined interlamellar PE regions. This allows for discriminating between the different crystalline phases and defining the final morphology, which depends on which polymer block crystallizes first on the substrate. This work also shows that the use of epitaxial crystallization and the choice of suitable substrate offer a means to produce oriented nanostructures and morphologies of block copolymers depending on the composition and the substrates.

Highlights

  • In semicrystalline block copolymers (BCPs) microphase separation arises from incompatibility of the blocks as in amorphous BCPs, or by crystallization of one or more blocks [1]

  • In this paper we report a study of the structure and morphology of a crystalline– crystalline BCP composed of blocks of crystallizable polyethylene (PE) and syndiotactic polypropylene (PE-b-sPP)

  • This agrees with the melting temperature of 144 ◦C of the sPP homopolymer synthesized with the same catalyst and in the same reaction conditions, consistent with a concentration of the syndiotactic pentad rrrr of 91%

Read more

Summary

Introduction

In semicrystalline block copolymers (BCPs) microphase separation arises from incompatibility of the blocks as in amorphous BCPs, or by crystallization of one or more blocks [1]. Microphase separation in the melt of dissimilar blocks and crystallization may compete and generate a wide range of morphologies [1,2,3,4,5,6,7]. The final morphology is path dependent and is the result of this competition and of the interplay between phase separation of the incompatible blocks and the crystallization of blocks [1,2,3,4,5,6,7]. From a homogeneous melt, it drives the microphase separation and the final structure is defined by the crystal morphology. In crystalline–crystalline block copolymers the crystallization of the first block may define the final morphology or be modified by the subsequent crystallization of the other block [20,21,22,23,24]

Methods
Results
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call