Abstract

Over the last two decades umbilical cord blood (UCB) transplantation (UCBT) is increasingly used for a variety of malignant and benign hematological and other diseases. The main factor that limits the use of UCB to low weight recipients, mainly children and adolescents, is its low progenitor cell content. Various alternatives have been exploited to overcome this difficulty, including the transplantation of two UCB units (double umbilical cord blood transplantation, dUCBT). Following dUCBT, donor(s) hematopoietic stem cells (HSC) can be detected in the peripheral blood of the recipient as soon as 14 days post-transplantation. Sustained engraftment of HSC from one or both donors can be observed- dominance or mixed chimerism respectively, although single donor unit dominance has been observed in over 85% of patients. The underlying biology, which accounts for the interactions both between the two infused UCB units- cooperative or competitive, and with the recipient’s immune system, has not been elucidated.

Highlights

  • In attempting to explain single unit dominance in dUCBT, both intrinsic properties of the infused units and immune interactions between the recipient and the donors are

  • The main factor that limits the use of UCB to low weight recipients, mainly children and ly adolescents, is its low progenitor cell content. n Various alternatives have been exploited to o overcome this difficulty, including the transplantation of two UCB units

  • Avery et al reported an association between higher CD3+ cell dose and unit dominance in patients undergoing dUCBT following myeloablative regime.[10]

Read more

Summary

Introduction

In attempting to explain single unit dominance in dUCBT, both intrinsic properties of the infused units and immune interactions between the recipient and the donors are. CD3+, degree of HLA/sex mismatch, ABO group, viability, order and route of infusion.[4] Avery et al reported an association between higher CD3+ cell dose and unit dominance in patients undergoing dUCBT following myeloablative regime.[10] Cell viability is a controversial issue.

Results
Conclusion
Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.