Abstract

A general quantum-mechanical formalism is reviewed for double electron capture from heliumlike atomic systems by fast nuclei. The development is carried out with and without the distorted wave theory by fulfilling the correct boundary conditions. These refer to the required asymptotic behaviors of the total scattering wave functions and their appropriate connections to the perturbation interactions that produce the transitions from the initial to the final states of the system. In this general formulation any choice is allowed for the pairs of the distorting potentials and the related distorted wave functions as long as the correct boundary conditions are satisfied. This is the case with the four-body versions of several most frequently used methods (continuum distorted wave: CDW-4B, boundary-corrected continuum intermediate state: BCIS-4B, Born distorted wave: BDW-4B, continuum distorted wave initial/final state: CDW-EIS/EFS-4B, and the boundary-corrected first Born: CB1-4B). A comparative analysis of these methods makes in evidence both their similarities and differences. For example, the most illustrative is the juxtaposition of the post BDW-4B and CDW-EIS-4B methods. They share the same distorting potential in the exit channel. The only difference is in the coordinates from the Coulomb logarithmic phases in the initial distorted wave functions. This difference is completely negligible in the asymptotic scattering regions. Yet, for e.g. double electron capture from helium by alpha particles, the total cross sections from these two methods differ by 1–3 orders of magnitudes. The BDW-4B method is in agreement with experimental data at high impact energies. In sharp contrast, within its validity domain of impact energies, the CDW-EIS-4B method underestimates the measured data by orders of magnitude. This shows that what matters is not solely the correct asymptotes of distorted wave functions, but rather how they affect the contributions to the integrals over the entire regions in the T-matrix elements for total cross sections. Such insights help understand the assessment of the overall validity and relative performance of various methods, and can provide a versatile guidance for improving the existing approximations for double charge exchange in fast ion–atom collisions.

Highlights

  • Journal of Mathematical Chemistry (2019) 57:1–58 tile guidance for improving the existing approximations for double charge exchange in fast ion–atom collisions

  • An explicit use of Ki(,efik) is convenient when showing that the inter-nuclear potential VPT does not contribute to the eikonal total cross sections computed from the eikonal version of the quantum-mechanical transition amplitudes in any method with the correct boundary conditions

  • We examine the overall performance of the CDW-4B and CDW-EIS-4B methods

Read more

Summary

B Dževad Belkic

Journal of Mathematical Chemistry (2019) 57:1–58 tile guidance for improving the existing approximations for double charge exchange in fast ion–atom collisions. This process occurs with non-negligible probabilities at the places where the initial and/or final bound state wave functions are appreciable It is at these places that the electrons to be captured experience the screened as an average target nuclear charge. Momentum-space bound-state wave functions come into play here because the charge exchange transition amplitudes are determined by the overlap integrals of the initial and final scattering states. Such overlap integrals contain the momentum-space bound-state wave functions that are initially given in the coordinate representations This becomes most obvious from an inspection of the well-known transition amplitude in the first-order Oppenheimer–Brinkman–Kramers (OBK) approximation for single electron capture processes [89].

Coulomb-modified initial and final scattering states without distorted waves
Eikonal formalism for dominant forward scatterings of heavy particles
The prior and post forms of the transition amplitudes
Coulomb-modified initial and final scattering states with distorted waves
Entrance channel
Exit channel
Asymptotic behaviors of distorted waves at large inter-particle distances
Different choices of the distorting potentials and distorted waves
Convergence issues with the Born series for rearrangement collisions
Illustrations
Discussion and conclusions
Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.