Abstract
Background While traditional surgical repair of the anterior cruciate ligament is able to restore anterior–posterior knee stability, laxity in the transverse plane remains. Double-bundle reconstruction has demonstrated greater rotational restraint than the single-bundle technique under passive loading conditions; however, no comparison has been made under physiological weight-bearing conditions. The purpose of this study was to determine differences in rotational knee kinematics during a dynamic task in patients who had received either a single- or double-bundle reconstruction. Methods Twenty-two patients exhibiting isolated anterior cruciate ligament rupture were randomly allocated either a single or double-bundle reconstruction. Three-dimensional knee kinematics were measured during a dynamic cutting activity prior to and following surgery. Functional range of rotation was compared between groups pre- and post-operatively and kinematics were assessed against uninjured control subjects. Findings No difference in overall range of rotation was found under physiological loading conditions. However, a significant interaction of the midpoint of the range of movement was observed; a greater external rotational shift in the single-bundle group followed reconstruction, while the kinematics of the double-bundle patient group shifted closer to those of the control group. Interpretation The double-bundle reconstruction demonstrated superior outcome in rotational kinematics to the single-bundle technique.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.