Abstract

Percutaneous isosorbide dinitrate cream and sustained-release tablets were compared in a double-blind randomised crossover trial in 28 patients with coronary artery disease and chronic stable angina pectoris. Twenty-two patients completed the trial. Both preparations significantly increased the mean exercise time to the onset of angina ( P < 0.001) and to termination of exercise ( P < 0.001) compared to the pre-treatment period. There were no significant differences between the cream and tablets with respect to frequency of anginal attacks, glyceryl trinitrate consumption, heart rate and ST segment depression at the onset of angina, ST segment depression at maximal exercise and the double product of heart rate and systolic blood pressure at maximal exercise. Equal numbers of patients expressed preference for cream and tablets. We conclude that in this group of patients isosorbide dinitrate sustained-release tablets have no clinical advantage over isosorbide dinitrate cream which, may, therefore, be of particular value for those patients with angina pectoris who dislike taking tablets or who prefer this form of nitrate preparation.

Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call