Abstract

Double-barrel stent placement across the iliocaval confluence is commonly used for the treatment of chronic bilateral iliocaval occlusion. The difference in the deployment outcomes of synchronous parallel stent deployment versus asynchronous or antiparallel deployment and the underlying stent interactions are poorly understood. In this study, 3 strategies of double-barrel nitinol self-expanding stent deployment across the iliocaval confluence (synchronous parallel, asynchronous parallel, and synchronous antiparallel) were contrasted in vivo in 3 swine followed by assessment of the explanted stent construct. Synchronous parallel stent deployment achieved a desired double-barrel configuration. The asynchronous parallel and antiparallel deployment strategies both resulted in a crushed stent despite subsequent simultaneous balloon angioplasty. These animal model results suggested that in patients who undergo double-barrel iliocaval reconstruction, synchronous parallel stent deployment may provide the desired stent conformation and increase the chance for clinical success.

Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call