Abstract

Experimental uncertainty will impact in silico model calculations of aerosol delivery and deposition. Patient-specific dosimetry models are often parameterized based on medical imaging data, which contain inherent experimental variability. Here, we created and parameterized 1D models of three subject-specific asthmatic subjects and randomly assigned perturbations of up to 15 % on airway diameter, segmental volume, and defected volume. Sensitivity of imaging data experimental variability on dosimetry metrics were quantified. Lobar particle delivery primarily depended on the distal segmental volumes; 15 % range of noise resulted in delivery to the upper right lobe to vary at most from 15.2 and 18.2 % for one of the severe subjects. Particle deposition was most sensitive to airway diameter; 95 % confidence intervals spanned from 8 to 10.6 % in the mild/moderate subject for 15 % variation on input metrics for 5 [Formula: see text] diameter particles. While these results provide possible ranges of dosimetry calculations for a specific subject, the perturbations were not sufficient to model the large observed inter-subject variability (8.9, 19, and 14.5 % deposition, subjects 1--3, respectively, 5 [Formula: see text] diameter particles). This study highlights that in silico model predictions are robust in the presence of experimental uncertainty and that it continues to be necessary to perform subject-specific simulations, especially within the presence of heterogeneous airway disease. Sensitivity analysis provides confidence in calculating deposition in the airways of asthmatic subjects within the presence of experimental uncertainty.

Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call