Abstract

Purpose3D printable material water equivalence was investigated within the range of Iridium-192 source energies. The aim is to compare the dose calculated by our treatment planning system (TPS) with the dose measured in the presence of printed materials. The purpose of this investigation is to assess the feasibility of using 3D materials for brachytherapy surface applicators. Methods and materialsCheetah was examined both in a water tank and with the CIRS anthropomorphic phantom. Calibrated Gafchromic EBT3-V3 film was used and the measurements compared with TG-43 calculations on Oncentra®Brachy. A 3D-printed slab 5 mm thick was created to position the source and two films were irradiated at 5 mm and 15 mm of distance. A curved mould with 7 trajectories was created and coupled with CIRS phantom. A set of CT images of phantom and mould was acquired and imported on TPS, where a target was defined and a dose plan was created. Plan was delivered with two films positioned between two different slabs of phantom, at reciprocal distance of 2 cm, orientated perpendicularly to the source axis. ResultsAll PDDs show a maximum difference of 4.7% (average 2.2%). At 5 mm and at 15 mm, the gamma pass rate is 100% with tolerance 2%/1 mm DTA. Results of films placed intra-slabs show a high pass rate (>99%) with tolerances of 2% dose and 1 mm DTA. Conclusion3D material investigated is water equivalent at Ir-192 energies and agreed with Oncentra®Brachy dose calculations which suggest that it is a suitable material for superficial brachytherapy.

Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call