Abstract
The purpose was to determine dose‐delivery errors resulting from systematic rotational setup errors for fractionated stereotactic radiotherapy using direct simulation in a treatment planning system. Ten patients with brain tumors who received intensity‐modulated radiotherapy had dose distributions re‐evaluated to assess the impact of systematic rotational setup errors. The dosimetric effect of rotational setup errors was simulated by rotating images and contours using a 3 by 3 rotational matrix. Combined rotational errors of ± 1°,± 3°,± 5° and ± 7° and residual translation errors of 1 mm along each axis were simulated. Dosimetric effects of the rotated images were evaluated by recomputing dose distributions and compared with the original plan. The mean volume of CTV that received the prescription dose decreased from 99.3%± 0.5% (original) to 98.6%± 1.6% (± 1°), 97.0%± 2.0% (± 3°), 93.1%± 4.6% (± 5°), and 87.8%± 14.2% (± 7°). Minimal changes in the cold and hot spots were seen in the CTV. In general, the increase in the volumes of the organs at risk (OARs) receiving the tolerance doses was small and did not exceed the tolerance, except for cases where the OARs were in close proximity to the PTV. For intracranial tumors treated with IMRT with a CTV‐to‐PTV margin of 3 mm, rotational setup errors of 3° or less didn't decrease the CTV coverage to less than 95% in most cases. However, for large targets with irregular or elliptical shapes, the target coverage decreased significantly as rotational errors of 5° or more were present. Our results indicate that setup margins are warranted even in the absence of translational setup errors to account for rotational setup errors. Rotational setup errors should be evaluated carefully for clinical cases involving large tumor sizes and for targets with elliptical or irregular shape, as well as when isocenter is away from the center of the PTV or OARs are in close proximity to the target volumes.PACS number: 87.53.Bn
Highlights
62 Peng et al.: Dosimetric consequences of rotational setup errors steep dose gradients and tight margins around the tumor, there is a greater risk of dose to surrounding organs at risk (OARs) due to setup errors and organ motion
Only bony structures are used to assess the setup deviations in 2D portal images because soft tissues are difficult to visualize in the planar-projection images.[2]. Computed tomography (CT) images are capable of identifying both bony structures and soft tissues, and CT is the standard reference to delineate organs and the target in treatment planning systems (TPSs)
We have evaluated the dose-delivery errors resulting from systematic rotational setup errors for fractionated stereotactic radiotherapy (SRT) using direct simulation in a TPS
Summary
62 Peng et al.: Dosimetric consequences of rotational setup errors steep dose gradients and tight margins around the tumor, there is a greater risk of dose to surrounding organs at risk (OARs) due to setup errors and organ motion. The practice of imaging treatment fields to localize the tumor has been carried out for several decades and has been referred to as megavoltage (MV) portal imaging. MV portal imaging has been performed using two-dimensional (2D) X-ray detectors to verify orthogonal localization fields and treatment ports. Only bony structures are used to assess the setup deviations in 2D portal images because soft tissues are difficult to visualize in the planar-projection images.[2] Computed tomography (CT) images are capable of identifying both bony structures and soft tissues, and CT is the standard reference to delineate organs and the target in treatment planning systems (TPSs). It is not surprising that volumetric CT registration in six degrees of freedom (DOF) performs more accurately than bony-structure registration based on 2D portal images.[2] There is a growing interest in CT-based imaging systems for 3D volumetric localization
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.