Abstract
BackgroundSince the optic pathways are the most vulnerable to radiation, the treatment of skull base tumors involving them is challenging. In this study simulation plans by multi-beam (MB) intensity-modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) and volumetric modulated arc therapy (VMAT), both with the flattened beam (FB) and flattening-filter-free beam (FFF), were compared in terms of covering of the target and sparing of the optic pathways.Materials and methodsTreatment planning was simulated by MB-IMRT with FB and FFF and by 2-rotational VMAT with FB and FFF in three cases of skull base meningioma [volume of the planned target volume (PTV; PTV margin=2 mm except for overlapping area with optic pathways or brainstem): 8.6 ml, 34.6 ml, and 55.3 ml respectively], which were treated previously by multi-fractionated MB-IMRT [45 Gy/18 fx. (fraction) with 7-, 6-, and 5-beam] using a conventional Novalis (BrainLAB, Tokyo, Japan) planned by iPlan (BrainLAB, Tokyo, Japan). In all three cases, the optic pathways were adjacent to the lesion. The reference CT with contouring data set of target volumes [gross tumor volume (GTV) and PTV] and OARs (organs at risk) was transferred from iPlan to Eclipse (Varian Medical Systems, Tokyo, Japan). In this study, hypofractionated radiation therapy by 30 Gy/5 fx. was designed; 95% dose (28.5 Gy/5 fx.) was prescribed to D95 (dose to 95% volume of PTV). Conformity index (CI), homogeneity index (HI, D5/D95), D[0.1 ml] (dose to 0.1 ml) for optic pathways, and D[1 ml] for brainstem and eyes, and V[20 Gy] (volume delivered with 20 Gy or more/5 fx.) of the whole brain were evaluated.ResultsThe indices did not differ between FB and FFF, in either MB-IMRT or VMAT. Between MB-IMRT and VMAT, the indices were similar. The mean dose of PTV and HI was a little larger with MB-IMRT than with VMAT. D[0.1 ml] of the optic pathways and D[1 ml] of the ipsilateral eye were smaller with VMAT in all three cases. D[1 ml] of the brainstem was smaller with VMAT in two cases, though it was similar in one case.ConclusionBased on our findings, VMAT with FFF might be the optimal method to treat cases of skull base meningioma involving optic pathways. However, further studies involving more cases are required to arrive at a conclusive verdict.
Highlights
Stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS)/stereotactic radiotherapy (SRT) is an effective and safe option for the treatment of benign brain tumors if the tumor is not large [1,2,3,4,5]
Treatment planning was simulated by MB-intensity-modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) with flattened beam (FB) and flattening-filter-free beam (FFF) and by 2-rotational volumetric modulated arc therapy (VMAT) with FB and FFF in three cases of skull base meningioma [volume of the planned target volume (PTV; PTV margin=2 mm except for overlapping area with optic pathways or brainstem): 8.6 ml, 34.6 ml, and 55.3 ml respectively], which were treated previously by multi-fractionated MB-IMRT [45 Gy/18 fx. with 7, 6, and 5beam] using a conventional Novalis (BrainLAB, Tokyo, Japan) planned by iPlan (BrainLAB, Tokyo, Japan)
The indices did not differ between FB and FFF, in either MB-IMRT or VMAT
Summary
Stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS)/stereotactic radiotherapy (SRT) is an effective and safe option for the treatment of benign brain tumors if the tumor is not large [1,2,3,4,5]. How to cite this article Isobe I, Mori Y, Kaneda N, et al (June 18, 2020) Dosimetric Comparison of Hypofractionated Multi-Beam Intensity-Modulated Radiation Therapy and Volumetric Modulated Arc Therapy With Flattened Beam and Flattening-Filter-Free Beam for Skull Base Meningioma Adjacent to Optic Pathways. In the clinical situation, when deciding how best to treat skull base benign tumors, we usually devise some different plans, such as dynamic conformal multi-arc therapy and intensity-modulated radiation therapy (IMRT). Simulation plans by MB-IMRT and VMAT, both with FB and FFF, were compared in terms of covering of target and sparing of OARs, especially the optic pathways. In this study simulation plans by multi-beam (MB) intensity-modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) and volumetric modulated arc therapy (VMAT), both with the flattened beam (FB) and flattening-filter-free beam (FFF), were compared in terms of covering of the target and sparing of the optic pathways
Sign-in/Register to view highlights & summary Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
