Abstract
Abstract A case study comparing three-dimensional conformal radiation therapy with field-in-field (FiF) technique and volumetric-modulated arc therapy (VMAT) for head/neck (H/N) irradiation, evaluating the differences in the treatment techniques and low doses to critical structures. Compared to VMAT plan, 3D FIF plan offers similar planning target volume coverage and acceptable organs at risk dose. Therefore, 3D FIF is still a feasible alternative for some centres unqualified for IMRT/VMAT worldwide.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
