Dosimetric Advantages of Online Adaptative Radiotherapy for Cervical Cancer on 1.5T MR-Linac

Abstract

Online adaptative radiotherapy (ART) strategy can be applied to account for inter-fraction organ motion while limiting organ at risk (OAR) dose. This study aims to evaluate tumor target and OARs inter- and intrafraction motion using online MRI during the full course of MR-Linac radiotherapy fractions. Furthermore, quantify the dosimetric consequences of online adaptative compared with non-adaptative radiotherapy (non-ART) in cervical cancer. Six cervix cancer patients were treated with 150 fractions on the 1.5 T Unity MR-Linac. Each fraction, pre-treatment MRI scans were obtained at the start of every treatment session, and post-treatment MRI scans were obtained at the end of every treatment session. A total 300 MR images were included in this study and the CTV, bladder and rectum were delineated on each MRI by the same radiation oncologist. The inter-fraction and intrafraction changes of contours were evaluated by dice similarity coefficient (DSC), Hausdorff distance (HD), volume difference (ΔV). The reference treatment plans were generated using step-and-shoot IMRT and utilized 9 beam groups on original CT. Then, the online adaptative treatment plans were obtained by re-optimizing based on the contours on daily pre-treatment MRI by "adapt to shape" workflow using the same beam parameters and optimization objectives from the reference plans. Non-ART plans for each patient were generated by recalculating the dose from the reference plans on daily online MRI by "adapt to position" workflow. CTV coverage and OARs constraints were used to compare ART and non-ART plans. The results showed that large inter-fraction anatomical changes limited the efficacy of radiation therapy (CTV: DSC: 0.89±0.03, HD: 20.83±5.05mm, ΔV: 1.21%±5.44%; Bladder: DSC: 0.68±0.18, HD: 30.58±15.75mm, ΔV: -10.17%±61.19%; Rectum: DSC: 0.69±0.09, HD: 22.98±12.03mm, ΔV: 21.01%±20.59%).The intrafraction anatomical changes were smaller (CTV: DSC: 0.96±0.01, HD: 8.85±3.54mm, ΔV: -0.64%±1.90%; Bladder: DSC: 0.90±0.07, HD: 14.62±9.56mm, ΔV: 19.83%±21.71%; Rectum: DSC: 0.98±0.04, HD: 2.90±4.27mm, ΔV: 0.13%±5.04%) . Non-ART showed inadequate primary CTV coverage in 30% of the daily fractions. Online adaptative plans improved CTV coverage significantly (p<0.001) to 99%. Compared with non-ART, online ART decreased the fraction dose to bladder and rectum indicated by significant (p<0.001) improvements for daily D50%, D2% and Dmean. In cervical cancer radiotherapy, a non-adaptive strategy led to inadequate target coverage for individual patients. Online adaptative radiotherapy corrected for day-to-day anatomical variations and resulted in adequate target coverage in all fractions. The dose to rectum and bladder was decreased significantly when applying online adaptative radiotherapy.