Abstract
A thorax phantom was used to assess radiotherapy dose deviations induced by respiratory motion of the target volume. Both intensity modulated and static, non‐modulated treatment plans were planned on CT scans of the phantom. The plans were optimized using various CT reconstructions, to investigate whether they had an impact on robustness to target motion during delivery. During irradiation, the target was programmed to simulate respiration‐induced motion of a lung tumor, using both patient‐specific and sinusoidal motion patterns in three dimensions. Dose was measured in the center of the target using an ion chamber. Differences between reference measurements with a stationary target and dynamic measurements were assessed. Possible correlations between plan complexity metrics and measured dose deviations were investigated. The maximum observed motion‐induced dose differences were 7.8% and 4.5% for single 2 Gy and 15 Gy fractions, respectively. The measurements performed with the largest target motion amplitude in the superior–inferior direction yielded the largest dosimetric deviations. For 2 Gy fractionation schemes, the summed dose deviation after 33 fractions is likely to be less than 2%. Measured motion‐induced dose deviations were significantly larger for one CT reconstruction compared to all the others. Static, non‐modulated plans showed superior robustness to target motion during delivery. Moderate correlations between the modulation complexity score applied to VMAT (MCSv) and measured dose deviations were found for 15 Gy SBRT treatment plans. Correlations between other plan complexity metrics and measured dose deviations were not found.
Highlights
Radiotherapy of lung cancer entails the challenge of delivering a prescribed dose to a target subjected to respiratory motion in a hypo‐ dense environment
The largest observed dose differences from one fraction to another, both delivered to the moving tumor with the same plan, were −16.0% and 4.8% for 2 Gy and 15 Gy fractions, respectively
For single 2 Gy fractions, maximum dose differences of 7.8% between static and dynamic measurements were observed. These effects appear to be attributable to interplay between multi‐leaf collimator (MLC) leaves and tumor motion
Summary
Radiotherapy of lung cancer entails the challenge of delivering a prescribed dose to a target subjected to respiratory motion in a hypo‐ dense environment. Motion amplitudes in the anterior–posterior (AP) and left–right (LR) directions are, not surprisingly, reported to be significantly smaller. Lower lobe tumors displacements were typically found to be larger than those of tumors elsewhere in the lung
Sign-in/Register to view highlights & summary Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
