Abstract

IntroductionFrontotemporal lobar degeneration (FTLD) is a clinical syndrome with pathological heterogeneity, including Pick’s disease and trans-activating response region (TAR) DNA-binding protein with a molecular mass of 43 kDa (TDP-43) proteinopathy (FTLD-TDP). A previous study reported abnormal findings on dopamine transporter (DAT) imaging in 30% of patients with frontotemporal dementia (FTD) in FTLD. However, the previous study did not consider the pathological heterogeneity of FTD regarding the pathomechanism leading to abnormal DAT findings. Recently, abnormal DAT findings were reported in two patients with FTLD with motor neuron disease (MND), of which FTLD-TDP type B was the most common pathological presentation. This study investigated the DAT findings of patients with a final diagnosis of FTLD-MND to determine the frequency of occurrence of DAT abnormalities in FTLD-MND.MethodsTwenty patients with FTLD who underwent DAT single photon emission computed tomography (DAT-SPECT) were screened, and six patients with a final diagnosis of FTLD-MND were ultimately included. The patients’ DAT-SPECT findings were analyzed visually and quantitatively. Neuronal loss and astrogliosis in brain regions (substantia nigra, caudate, and putamen) that could possibly affect DAT findings were evaluated in the three pathologically confirmed cases.ResultAll six patients with FTLD-MND showed abnormal visual DAT-SPECT findings. In addition, in a quantitative assessment, the specific binding ratio in the striatum calculated by the Southampton method was below the lower limit of the 95% prediction interval of the healthy controls by age in all the present cases. Interestingly, three of the six patients showed abnormal findings on DAT-SPECT more than half a year before the onset of MND. Neuronal loss and astrogliosis in brain regions that may affect DAT findings were observed in three pathologically confirmed cases.ConclusionDopamine transporter single photon emission computed tomography revealed abnormal findings in patients with FTLD-MND, which may manifest even before the onset of MND symptoms. We believe that the possibility of future development of MND should be considered if DAT-SPECT shows abnormal findings in FTLD.

Highlights

  • Frontotemporal lobar degeneration (FTLD) is a clinical syndrome with pathological heterogeneity, including Pick’s disease and trans-activating response region (TAR) DNA-binding protein with a molecular mass of 43 kDa (TDP-43) proteinopathy (FTLD-TDP)

  • 17 had behavioral variants of frontotemporal dementia (FTD) that met the diagnostic criteria of Rascovsky et al (2011), and three had semantic dementia (SD) that met the diagnostic criteria of Neary et al (1998)

  • The dopamine transporter (DAT)-SPECT findings and assessments of DAT-SPECT are shown in Figure 3 and Table 2, respectively

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Frontotemporal lobar degeneration (FTLD) is a clinical syndrome with pathological heterogeneity, including Pick’s disease and trans-activating response region (TAR) DNA-binding protein with a molecular mass of 43 kDa (TDP-43) proteinopathy (FTLD-TDP). FTLD has diverse pathological conditions and is classified mainly into FTLD-tau (corticobasal degeneration, progressive supranuclear palsy, and Pick’s disease), FTLD-trans-activating response region (TAR) DNA-binding protein with a molecular mass of 43 kDa (TDP-43) (FTLD-TDP), and FTLD-fused sarcoma (FTLD-FUS) based on the protein composition of the neuronal and glial inclusions (Mackenzie et al, 2010). FTLD-TDP is categorized into types A to D based on the morphology and localization of TDP inclusions (Mackenzie et al, 2011) Such pathological diversity can make it difficult to predict the subsequent clinical course in the early stages of the disease (Yokota et al, 2021). A previous study reported abnormal findings on DAT-SPECT in 30% of patients with frontotemporal dementia in FTLD (Morgan et al, 2012), which has a heterogeneous pathological basis (Mackenzie et al, 2010). The mechanism causing the abnormal DAT-SPECT findings in FTD may vary depending on the pathological basis, but this is not discussed in the study

Objectives
Methods
Results
Conclusion

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.