Abstract

SummaryBackgroundOptimal choices require an accurate neuronal representation of economic value. In economics, utility functions are mathematical representations of subjective value that can be constructed from choices under risk. Utility usually exhibits a nonlinear relationship to physical reward value that corresponds to risk attitudes and reflects the increasing or decreasing marginal utility obtained with each additional unit of reward. Accordingly, neuronal reward responses coding utility should robustly reflect this nonlinearity.ResultsIn two monkeys, we measured utility as a function of physical reward value from meaningful choices under risk (that adhered to first- and second-order stochastic dominance). The resulting nonlinear utility functions predicted the certainty equivalents for new gambles, indicating that the functions’ shapes were meaningful. The monkeys were risk seeking (convex utility function) for low reward and risk avoiding (concave utility function) with higher amounts. Critically, the dopamine prediction error responses at the time of reward itself reflected the nonlinear utility functions measured at the time of choices. In particular, the reward response magnitude depended on the first derivative of the utility function and thus reflected the marginal utility. Furthermore, dopamine responses recorded outside of the task reflected the marginal utility of unpredicted reward. Accordingly, these responses were sufficient to train reinforcement learning models to predict the behaviorally defined expected utility of gambles.ConclusionsThese data suggest a neuronal manifestation of marginal utility in dopamine neurons and indicate a common neuronal basis for fundamental explanatory constructs in animal learning theory (prediction error) and economic decision theory (marginal utility).

Highlights

  • The shapes of von-Neumann and Morgenstern’’ (vNM) utility functions are unique, and this formalism permits meaningful approximation of marginal utility—the additional utility gained by consuming additional units of reward—as the first derivative, dU/dx [5]

  • Despite considerable progress demonstrating that numerous brain structures are involved in economic decision-making [6,7,8,9,10,11,12,13,14,15,16,17], no animal neurophysiology study has investigated how neurons encode the nonlinear relationship between utility and physical value, as defined by expected utility theory

  • Measurement of neuronal reward responses when utility functions are defined with regard to physical value could provide biological insight regarding the relationship between the satisfaction experienced from reward and the utility function defined from choices

Read more

Summary

Introduction

The St. Petersburg paradox famously demonstrated that economic choices could not be predicted from physical value. The quantitative relationship between utility and physical value, U(x), can be reconstructed from choices under risk [3]. Such ‘‘von-Neumann and Morgenstern’’ (vNM) utility functions are cardinal, in the strict sense that they are defined up to a positive affine (shape-preserving) transformation [4], in contrast to ordinal utility relationships that are only defined up to a monotonic (rank-preserving) transformation [2]. Measurement of neuronal reward responses when utility functions are defined with regard to physical value could provide biological insight regarding the relationship between the satisfaction experienced from reward and the utility function defined from choices

Results
Discussion
Conclusion
Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.