DOP16 Safety of long-term ozanimod treatment for up to 4 years in patients with moderately to severely active Ulcerative Colitis: an interim analysis of the True North open-label extension

Abstract

Abstract Background The 52-week, phase 3 True North (TN) study (NCT02435992) demonstrated the efficacy and safety of ozanimod (OZA), a highly selective sphingosine 1-phosphate receptor 1 and 5 modulator, in patients (pts) with moderately to severely active ulcerative colitis (UC). A prior analysis reported the long-term safety of up to 3 y of OZA in the ongoing TN open-label extension (OLE; NCT02531126; from TN baseline to OLE Week [W] 94). This analysis presents the cumulative long-term safety of OZA in TN and the TN OLE for an additional year (up to OLE W142). Methods The TN study design has been previously described. This analysis included all TN pts who entered the OLE from TN (clinical nonresponders at W10, lost response during maintenance, or completed maintenance at W52). Safety assessments were reported from the first dose of OZA either in TN or OLE up to OLE W142. Lab abnormalities, including absolute lymphocyte count (ALC) reductions, were reported. Exposure-adjusted incidence rates (EAIRs) per 100 patient-years (PY) were calculated for all treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs). Results A total of 823 pts entered the TN OLE (average age: 41.7 y; 59% male); 62% had left-sided UC disease. Total PY exposure to OZA at OLE W142 was 2536 y. Overall, the cumulative safety assessments did not significantly change with an additional year of OZA exposure from OLE W94 to W142 (Table). A decrease in EAIRs per 100 PY was observed in overall TEAEs (85.5 vs 87.6) and serious TEAEs (7.0 vs 7.4) at OLE W142 vs OLE W94, respectively. Notably, with an additional year of OZA exposure, TEAEs leading to treatment discontinuation remained at 2.5 EAIR/100 PY, and there were no new cases of bradycardia or atrioventricular block. One new TEAE each of herpes zoster, macular oedema, cystoid macular oedema, myocardial ischaemia, pulmonary embolism, and deep vein thrombosis were noted. COVID-19 TEAEs increased at OLE W142 (n=103; EAIR: 4.3/100 PY) from OLE W94 (n=66; EAIR: 3.0/100 PY). Reductions in ALC <500 cells/mm3 were common in the OLE (OLE W94, 54.0%; OLE W142, 56.1%); few pts had ALC <200 cells/mm3 (OLE W94, 5.3%; OLE W142, 6.5%), but these pts had no serious infections. No serious hepatic safety events were observed. One new death due to adenocarcinoma, which was unrelated to OZA, was reported. Conclusion The ongoing safety profile of OZA is consistent with previous analyses, with no new safety signals identified compared with previous UC analyses. Long-term use of OZA representing 2536 PYs of exposure continues to be well tolerated in pts with moderately to severely active UC.