Abstract
We compared the effects of intraosseous BMT with those of standard i.v. BMT on the efficacy on donor-cell engraftment into the BM and lymphoid organs across an MHC barrier in rats. Twenty-four intraosseous and 24 i.v. BMTs were performed from 48 ACI (RT1(a)) donors to 48 Lewis (RT1(l)) recipients. Each transplant group received either intraosseous or i.v. BMT. Groups I and II served as controls without immunosuppression (n=16); groups III and IV received cyclosporine monotherapy (n=16); and V and VI received alphabeta-TCR monoclonal antibody and cyclosporine A (alphabeta-TCR/CsA) for 7 days (n=16). In each group, four rats received 35 x 10(6) transplanted bone marrow cells (BMCs) and four received 70 x 10(6) cells. All animals survived without GVHD. Mean (+/-s.d.) donor-cell engraftment into BM of recipients after intraosseous BMT was 7.9% (+/-1.3%) in recipients receiving alphabeta-TCR-CsA and 70 x 10(6) BMCs, and 4.2% (+/-1.4%) in recipients after i.v. transplantation. The seeding efficacy of donor cells into lymphoid tissue was greater after intraosseous BMT and alphabeta-TCR-CsA than after standard i.v. transplantation. In our model, intraosseous BMT facilitated donor-cell engraftment under short-term immunodepletive alphabeta-TCR/CsA protocol, which resulted in a temporary state of immune unresponsiveness.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.