Abstract

One of the aspects of the development of Russian architectural restoration in the twentieth century was the selection and formation of regional architectural restoration schools. The purpose of the study: to identify the features of the leading schools of Russian architectural restoration in the twentieth century. Methods: a comprehensive study, comparative analysis of architectural and restoration practices of Moscow, Novgorod, Vladimir-Suzdal, Leningrad, Pskov restoration schools based on the generalization of bibliographic material. Results: the role of architectural and restoration schools in the development of scientific theory and practice of restoration in the twentieth century is Revealed.the features of restoration techniques and methodological approaches of Moscow, Novgorod, Vladimir-Suzdal, Leningrad, Pskov restoration schools are Analyzed. The influence of the typological and architectural and artistic context, the degree of its preservation, on the specifics of architectural and restoration activities of individual schools is revealed. The prevailing types of restoration (integral, fragmentary, compromise, synthetic) at the main stages of formation of domestic restoration schools are determined.

Highlights

  • The study of architectural and restoration schools of the twentieth century is a separate area of fundamental research in the theory and practice of national restoration

  • The research raises the problem of continuity and contradiction of methodological principles, including those formed within the framework of individual restoration schools of the second half of the twentieth century, and modern trends in working with monuments [1]

  • A number of scientific articles by the author are devoted to identifying the features of domestic schools of architectural restoration of the twentieth century

Read more

Summary

Introduction

The study of architectural and restoration schools of the twentieth century is a separate area of fundamental research in the theory and practice of national restoration. General regularities and trends of restoration activity in the aspect of a wide range of monuments of architecture and art are considered in the works of Yu. Bobrov [4,5]. The research raises the problem of continuity and contradiction of methodological principles, including those formed within the framework of individual restoration schools of the second half of the twentieth century, and modern trends in working with monuments [1]. A number of scientific articles by the author are devoted to identifying the features of domestic schools of architectural restoration of the twentieth century. In the framework of this study, a step is being made towards a comprehensive systematic analysis of the features of architectural and restoration schools established in certain regions of the country in the 20th century

Materials and Methods
Results and Discussion
Conclusions
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call